11 research outputs found

    Optimal General Matchings

    Full text link
    Given a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) and for each vertex v∈Vv \in V a subset B(v)B(v) of the set {0,1,…,dG(v)}\{0,1,\ldots, d_G(v)\}, where dG(v)d_G(v) denotes the degree of vertex vv in the graph GG, a BB-factor of GG is any set F⊆EF \subseteq E such that dF(v)∈B(v)d_F(v) \in B(v) for each vertex vv, where dF(v)d_F(v) denotes the number of edges of FF incident to vv. The general factor problem asks the existence of a BB-factor in a given graph. A set B(v)B(v) is said to have a {\em gap of length} pp if there exists a natural number k∈B(v)k \in B(v) such that k+1,…,k+p∉B(v)k+1, \ldots, k+p \notin B(v) and k+p+1∈B(v)k+p+1 \in B(v). Without any restrictions the general factor problem is NP-complete. However, if no set B(v)B(v) contains a gap of length greater than 11, then the problem can be solved in polynomial time and Cornuejols \cite{Cor} presented an algorithm for finding a BB-factor, if it exists. In this paper we consider a weighted version of the general factor problem, in which each edge has a nonnegative weight and we are interested in finding a BB-factor of maximum (or minimum) weight. In particular, this version comprises the minimum/maximum cardinality variant of the general factor problem, where we want to find a BB-factor having a minimum/maximum number of edges. We present an algorithm for the maximum/minimum weight BB-factor for the case when no set B(v)B(v) contains a gap of length greater than 11. This also yields the first polynomial time algorithm for the maximum/minimum cardinality BB-factor for this case

    How Group Size Affects Vigilance Dynamics and Time Allocation Patterns: The Key Role of Imitation and Tempo

    Get PDF
    In the context of social foraging, predator detection has been the subject of numerous studies, which acknowledge the adaptive response of the individual to the trade-off between feeding and vigilance. Typically, animals gain energy by increasing their feeding time and decreasing their vigilance effort with increasing group size, without increasing their risk of predation (‘group size effect’). Research on the biological utility of vigilance has prevailed over considerations of the mechanistic rules that link individual decisions to group behavior. With sheep as a model species, we identified how the behaviors of conspecifics affect the individual decisions to switch activity. We highlight a simple mechanism whereby the group size effect on collective vigilance dynamics is shaped by two key features: the magnitude of social amplification and intrinsic differences between foraging and scanning bout durations. Our results highlight a positive correlation between the duration of scanning and foraging bouts at the level of the group. This finding reveals the existence of groups with high and low rates of transition between activies, suggesting individual variations in the transition rate, or ‘tempo’. We present a mathematical model based on behavioral rules derived from experiments. Our theoretical predictions show that the system is robust in respect to variations in the propensity to imitate scanning and foraging, yet flexible in respect to differences in the duration of activity bouts. The model shows how individual decisions contribute to collective behavior patterns and how the group, in turn, facilitates individual-level adaptive responses
    corecore